Going into 2024, the question on many people’s minds was how soon the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks would start cutting rates and whether they would move in lockstep. Now, going into 2025, a significant focus is on the nature and magnitude of proposed U.S. tariffs and how the U.S. economy—and the world—will react.
Of course, many of the details surrounding the tariffs remain undecided and will remain that way until after President-elect Donald Trump takes office in January and new tariffs are announced. However, even so, experts say history-and economics-can help sketch what the path ahead may look like.
Will tariffs cause inflation to rise again? What about growth?
Overall, it's not the use of tariffs in general that has some economists concerned, but rather how broad or large the tariffs might be. During his campaign, Trump's proposals included imposing a Arancel general del 10 al 20 por ciento sobre todas las importaciones, con aranceles adicionales del 60 al 100 por ciento sobre el bienes importados de China, y un arancel del 25 al 100 por ciento sobre mercancías de México—if the Mexican government doesn’t take steps on its end to close the U.S.-Mexico border.
As BOK Financial® Chief Investment Strategist Steve Wyett explained, “Targeted tariffs can help keep China from dumping steel on the global market, for example, or something of that nature, but the broad use of tariffs probably causes as much economic damage as it helps.
"If you're using tariffs to protect domestic producers, inevitably, what you're saying is, 'I'm going to raise the price of this foreign good that can be imported cheaper, so it can be made here.' However, that means consumers are now going to be asked to pay a higher price for the good either by paying the tariff on what's imported or by paying a little bit higher price for a domestic producer to produce the good. The domestic producer is going to price it as close to the tariff price as possible," he explained.
And so, broad tariffs tend to be inflationary from a price standpoint, right up to the point that it destroys demand, Wyett continued. "Then, all of the sudden, you just have lower economic growth."
At the same time, proponents of broad tariffs argue the opposite. For instance, the Washington International Trade Association (WITA)-a non-profit, non-partisan organization that includes the president and CEO of the American Apparel & Footwear Association as president of its' board-publicized a trade model that predicts broad tariffs would benefit U.S. consumers and businesses in multiple ways.
Specifically, the 2022 model looks at the impact of a 15% revenue tariff increase on all imported goods, and a 35% tariff increase on some imports that are significant for economic reasons or for "national resilience," such as imports from Non-Free Trade Agreement (NFTA) countries. With those in place, the model predicted a 7% boost to the U.S. economy,10 million new jobs, a 10% in inflation-adjusted household income and $603 billion generated in federal revenue.
However, the model uses tariff figures that differ significantly from the ones Trump suggested during his campaign. To put all of these numbers into perspective, you have to go back nearly 200 years to 1830 when the highest tariff in U.S. history, a near-62% tax on all dutiable imports, was imposed and received strong political opposition within the U.S. The second-highest tariff was the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which raised around 900 import tariffs by an average of 40% to 60%. As Wyett pointed out, this act is believed to have been a driver of the Great Depression, “but I don’t think we're in the same position now,” he added.
How will other countries react?
One reason why the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act is believed to have helped cause the Great Depression is because of its significant reduction in global trade. In response to the act, around two dozen countries enacted high tariffs of their own within two years of its passage, causing a 65% drop in international trade between 1929 and 1934.
Trump’s proposed tariffs on China and Mexico, in particular, could have serious effects on those countries—on top of the struggles they are already having—and no one knows how they and other countries would react, experts said.
“If Trump does come in and put those tariffs into place, then that's obviously going to have a detrimental effect on the economy in China,” said Peter Tibbles, senior vice president of foreign exchange trading for BOK Financial.
"They've been trying to grow-but it's a struggle. They've got a lot of housing problems. There is a middle class now in China, which is great, but it's gotten to the stage where housing is a little saturated and they have all these zombie towns where they can't sell the property, so many of the massive property conglomerates are in a lot of trouble," he explained.
In turn, China’s reaction to high U.S. tariffs could also impact the energy market, said Dennis Kissler, vicepresidente sénior de operaciones en BOK Financial. "In retaliation, they could come against U.S. crude imports into their country. It also would weaken their economy. Remember that they're the largest crude importer, so if we weaken their economy, the biggest demand puller is going to be coming down and then that's going to be a problem."
Another question is how Chinese exporters themselves will react, Tibbles said. "People say, 'It's going to hurt Chinese exporters.' Well, if that's true, then do they slow down their exports? Do they export to other places in the world where there are no tariffs? Until we know more details from President-elect Trump on how it's going to look, it's very difficult to come up with good answers."
Mexico, meanwhile, is dealing with controversial judicial reforms which could impact the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Tibbles said. "It's not just a U.S. story; it's a Mexico story as well."
However, until more is known about Trump's tariff policy, it's hard to know what that story is, experts stressed time and time again. "Obviously, it's going to affect trade, but how it affects trade can be very different, depending on the specific policies," Tibbles said.